This week, there were 32 companies, or 14, because of limited practice-www.b aidu.com

This week to suspend review of corporate surge to 32 14 firms or because of limited practice of sina finance Level2:A shares of sina finance client speed Kanpan: the most profitable investors are in use as of February 4th, the Commission accepted the first 766 enterprises, of which, 109 have passed will not be over 657, – reporter Zhu Baochen   "Securities Daily" the reporter learned from the Commission in February 5th, as of February 4, 2016, the Commission accepted the first 766 enterprises, of which, 109 have passed will not be over 657. Not too would normally pending corporate enterprise 625, 32 enterprises suspend the review. It is worth noting that, this week, the number of enterprises to suspend censorship increased significantly compared with the previous week. A week ago, only 18 companies were suspended. "Securities Daily" reporter noted that this week, the new joined the review team, mainly from the Shenzhen stock exchange small and medium plate enterprises, there are 9. In addition, the Shanghai Stock Exchange enterprises increased from 7 to 8, the gem enterprises increased from 11 to 15. "Securities Daily" reporter noted that in the suspension of the review of the enterprise, there are 16 reasons given by the Commission as "the practice of limited doubts about the qualification of the issuer or intermediary resulting in the audit process can not continue". In this regard, there are investment bankers unwilling to disclose the identity of the broker to the "Securities Daily" the reporter said that the reason for these companies to suspend the review, the vast majority of the estimates and enterprises hired the law firm. According to the "Securities Daily" reporters, the 16 companies engaged in a law firm, in addition to Sichuan Taiwan Wo agricultural science and technology hired for the city of Beijing Jin Du LLP, Shenzhen Junda photoelectric hired as Tahota law firm, the other 14 were hired by the Bank of Beijing law firm. According to reports, the bank in Liaoning Zhenlong specialty Corporation IPO provides securities services in the business process not suspected diligence according to "Securities Law" the relevant provisions, the Commission decided to initiate an investigation. In March 13, 2015, Chinese Securities Industry Association organized and completed the quality checks of the draw on the IPO enterprise information disclosure, draw in the 40 enterprises, Liaoning Zhenlong specialty Limited by Share Ltd, Sichuan imperial ware Limited by Share Ltd was pumped in. By the Bank of China "dragged", there are a number of listed companies non-public offering. Such as Tianjin Songjiang February 2nd announcement said: as the company’s non-public offering of stock hired by the Bank of Beijing law firm for other financial problems in the project is China Commission investigation,   Chinese Commission in January 29, 2016 issued a "stop notice" review (No. 151871), decided to suspend the company non-public offering application. Similarly, by the Bank of China "drag", there are the Atlantic, Zhangzhou development, Yin Zhijie and so on. These companies have announced that received under the Commission issued the "Chinese Commission suspended review notice" for administrative licensing, decided to suspend the termination of the company’s non-public offering of shares of administrative license application review. However, these theories are very important 本周中止审查企业骤增至32家 14家或因律所执业行为受限 新浪财经Level2:A股极速看盘 新浪财经客户端:最赚钱的投资者都在用   截至2月4日,证监会受理首发企业766家,其中,已过会109家,未过会657家   ■本报记者 朱宝琛   《证券日报》记者2月5日从证监会获悉,截至2016年2月4日,证监会受理首发企业766家,其中,已过会109家,未过会657家。未过会企业中正常待审企业625家,中止审查企业32家。   值得关注的是,本周,中止审查的企业数量较此前一周大幅增加。此前一周,中止审查企业数量只有18家。《证券日报》记者注意到,本周新加入中止审查队伍的,主要是来自深交所中小板企业,有9家。此外,上交所企业由7家增加至8家,创业板企业由11家增加至15家。   《证券日报》记者注意到,在这些中止审查的企业中,有16家证监会给出的原因为“发行人主体资格存疑或中介机构执业行为受限导致审核程序无法继续”。   对此,有不愿透露身份的券商投行人士向《证券日报》记者表示,这些企业中止审查的原因,估计绝大多数与企业所聘请的律师事务所有关。   据《证券日报》记者观察,上述16家公司所聘请的律师事务所中,除了四川台沃农业科技聘请的为北京市金杜律师事务所,深圳市骏达光电聘请的为泰和泰律师事务所,另外14家聘请的均为北京市中银律师事务所。   据报道,中银所因在辽宁振隆特产股份公司IPO提供证券服务业务过程中涉嫌未勤勉尽责,根据《证券法》有关规,证监会决定对其立案调查。   2015年3月13日,中国证券业协会组织完成了对IPO企业信息披露质量抽查的抽签工作,参与抽签的40家企业中,辽宁振隆特产股份有限公司、四川帝王洁具股份有限公司被抽中。   受中银所“拖累”的还有多家上市公司的非公开发行。如天津松江2月2日发布的公告称:由于公司本次非公开发行股票所聘请的北京市中银律师事务所因其他在 审项目存在财务问题被中国证监会立案调查, 中国证监会于2016年1月29日出具了《中止审查通知书》(151871号),决定中止公司本次非公开发行 股票申请。   同样遭中银所“拖累”的还有大西洋、漳州发展、银之杰等。这几家公司均发布公告称收到了证监会下发的《中国证监会行政许可申请中止审查通知书》,决定暂停终止公司非公开发行股票行政许可申请的审查。   不过,这几家公司目前均已经委托新的律师事务所为公司非公开发行提供法律服务。 进入【新浪财经股吧】讨论相关的主题文章: